The Steadicam™ Body-rig and
Its Forces on the Human Body
by Dr. Carl C. Howard, III and Dr. Carl
C. Howard, Jr.

Click thumbnails for larger
view
|
Have you ever wondered just what forces are
exerted on the back while using a Steadicam? This study was done
to find that answer.
A dynamic Surface Electro Myograph (SEMG) was
used to measure the increase in muscle activity while an operator
was wearing a 70 lb Steadicam body-rig.
Measurements were taken on the muscles of the
neck and low back during 5 different common motions of the Steadicam
operator.
The measurements were taken first without the
vest and Steadicam apparatus, and then while wearing the vest
and Steadicam apparatus. The 5 motions were:
- Standing, moving the camera forward;
- Standing, moving the camera to the side;
- Standing, moving the camera to the back;
- Standing, going to a lunging position;
- Standing, going to a seated position.
The study was performed on three people. Glenn
DiVincenzo soc (Subject 1), a 6'1" 185 lb male. Liz Ziegler SOC
(Subject 2) 140 lb female. Both of these people were experienced
Steadicam operators. And Carl Howard DC (Subject 3), a 6'1" 210
lb male, who had never seen a Steadicam before, let alone operated
one.
METHODS
The basic principle of the SEMG is simple.
When a muscle contracts it gives off electricity which can be
measured in micro-volts (1/1,000,000 of a volt). The more a muscle
has to work the more electricity it gives off. For this study,
measurements were taken along the posterior muscles of the neck
along with the posterior muscles of the low back. Measurements
were first taken in the 5 motions without the Steadicam apparatus
and then with the Steadicam apparatus on. For each motion the
two figures were compared and a percent difference was obtained.
The results were quite interesting.
RESULTS
It must be noted that this study was performed
on only three people and therefore should not be taken as scientific
fact but as a basis from which to build our knowledge and better
understand the usage of this equipment in a safe and effective
manner.
The results of this study are best understood
if we examine each position individually. The percent differences
are without the Steadicam apparatus vs. with the Steadicam apparatus.
|
SUBJECTS
AND RESULTS
|
| Subject 1 - 6'1", 185 lb.,
Male, Experienced operator. |
| Subject 2 - 5'11", 140 lb.,
Female. Experienced operator. |
| Subject 3 - 6'1", 210 lb.,
Male, Inexperienced operator. |
Position
1. Standing, moving the camera forward.
|
| SUBJECT |
AREA |
%DIFFERENCE |
AREA |
%DIFFERENCE |
1
|
Neck
|
+135%
|
Low Back
|
+189%
|
2
|
Neck
|
+44%
|
Low Back
|
+253%
|
3
|
Neck
|
+104%
|
Low Back
|
+99%
|
Avg. of All
|
Neck
|
+94%
|
Low Back
|
+180%
|
Position
2. Standing, moving the camera to the side.
|
SUBJECT
|
AREA
|
%DIFFERENCE
|
AREA
|
%DIFFERENCE
|
1
|
Neck
|
+24%
|
Low Back
|
+118%
|
2
|
Neck
|
+22%
|
Low Back
|
+180%
|
3
|
Neck
|
+162%
|
Low Back
|
+102%
|
Avg. of All
|
Neck
|
+70%
|
Low Back
|
+133%
|
Position
3. Standing, moving the camera to the back.
|
SUBJECT
|
AREA
|
%DIFFERENCE
|
AREA
|
%DIFFERENCE
|
1
|
Neck
|
+71%
|
Low Back
|
+226%
|
2
|
Neck
|
+26%
|
Low Back
|
+299%
|
3
|
Neck
|
+49%
|
Low Back
|
+310%
|
Avg. of All
|
Neck
|
+49%
|
Low Back
|
+278%
|
Position
4. Standing, going to a lunging position.
|
SUBJECT
|
AREA
|
%DIFFERENCE
|
AREA
|
%DIFFERENCE
|
1
|
Neck
|
+266%
|
Low Back
|
+143%
|
2
|
Neck
|
+117%
|
Low Back
|
+107%
|
3
|
Neck
|
+104%
|
Low Back
|
+77%
|
Avg. of All
|
Neck
|
+162%
|
Low Back
|
+109%
|
Position 5. Standing,
going to a seated position.
|
SUBJECT
|
AREA
|
%DIFFERENCE
|
AREA
|
%DIFFERENCE
|
1
|
Neck
|
+354%
|
Low Back
|
+148%
|
2
|
Neck
|
+93%
|
Low Back
|
+64%
|
3
|
Neck
|
+48%
|
Low Back
|
+63%
|
Avg. of All
|
Neck
|
+165%
|
Low Back
|
+92%
|
WHAT DO ALL THESE NUMBERS MEAN?
The main information these numbers reveal is
that the muscle activity of the three subjects tested increased
an average of 108% in the neck and 158% in the low back over
the five tests. Certain individual tests revealed increases that
were significantly higher than others. For example, in position
3 (Standing, moving the camera to the back) while there was only
an average of 49% increase in muscle activity in the neck, there
was an average of 278% increase in muscle activity in the low
back. From what this author understands, this motion is used
the least of the 5 motions studied, and for good reason. The
large increase in muscle activity combined with the twisting
motion necessary for this motion can be dangerous, significantly
increasing the possibility of a low back injury.
GENDER DIFFERENCE
Another interesting finding was that the female
of the subject group used the muscles in her low back 3 times
more than the muscles in her neck, whereas the men used the two
muscle groups virtually the same amount. I postulate that these
results were obtained because females are proportionally stronger
in the lower half of their bodies, and males are more proportionally
equal from upper body to lower body.
STEADICAM™ EFFECTS
To examine the effects of the motion of the
Steadicam on the body we must look at graph
1. Graph 1 is taken of subject 3 during position 1, on his
low back. (Standing, moving the camera forward) Lines 1, 3, & 5
represent the camera at arms length, where lines 2, 4, & 6 represent
the camera close to the body. With the camera being on the right
side, you can see that with the camera at arm's length (the top
of the graph) the muscles on the right side of the low back are
averaging around 900 micro-volts, whereas at the bottom of the
graph, with the camera close to the body, the muscles are averaging
90 micro-volts. This means that the camera at arm's length puts
10 times the amount of stress on the muscles of the low back
than when the camera is at the side of the body. So let's put
this into real numbers. Assuming the entire camera apparatus
weighs approximately 70 lbs, and the average width of a person's
torso is 9 inches. When the camera is 9 inches in front of the
body, you are putting 70 lbs of force on the low back. When the
arm is fully extended and the camera is approximately 27 inches
in front of the body, you are putting 210 lbs of force on the
low back. (See illustration)
This is quite a substantial force and explains the ten fold increase
in muscle activity with the camera at arm's length.
CONCLUSION
The question remains, what can be done to use
the Steadicam more safely? I have four main recommendations for
those who will be using the Steadicam.
1. PROPER POSTURE
Proper posture in this case means keeping your
legs under your weight at all times and avoid bending at the
waist as much as possible. If it is required of you to put yourself
in an awkward position with the Steadicam, have spotters standing
close by to help you with any difficult movements.
2. KEEP THE CAMERA AS CLOSE TO YOUR
BODY AS POSSIBLE
As shown in the figures and diagrams, the closer
to your body you keep the camera the less stress you put on your
back and the less chance you have of injuring your back. When
those times arrive when you must hold the camera at arm's length,
only do it for short periods of time and use a support if possible.
3. TRY TO AVOID STANDING AND TURNING
THE CAMERA TO THE BACK
The combination of the twisting involved and
the stress put on the low back greatly increase the possibility
of a low back injury, particularly a discal injury.
4. MAINTAIN A GOOD EXCERCISE PROGRAM
Although no exercise program will guarantee
freedom from a back injury, a good exercise program can greatly
decrease the possibility of a back injury.
HOW?
I have four main recommendations to keeping
a strong and healthy back.
- Strengthen the muscles of the low back.
- Strengthen the abdominal muscles.
- Strengthen the leg muscles including glutes,
quadriceps, hamstrings, and calves.
- Regularly stretch the hamstrings and
low back.
Proper exercise and stretching even for people
already in great shape will undoubtedly make operating a Steadicam
much safer.
STAY SAFE
When filming with a Steadicam or any other
type of camera for that matter always be aware of the safety
measures involved. Taking a few moments to think of a safer way
to accomplish a shot may save you immeasurable amounts of time,
money, and pain. 80% of all people will experience low back pain
at some point in their lives. Don't push the odds higher by not
following good safety procedures and good common sense.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to thank all those who
gave their time and effort to make this project possible and
successful: Bill Hines, Liz Ziegler, Glenn DiVincenzo, Ray Stella
and David Robman, all active SOC members.
Dr. Carl C. Howard III -
After he completed his undergraduate studies at the University
of California at Irvine in Biology, he graduated from the Los
Angeles College of Chiropractic. He is currently in private
practice in North Hollywood, CA.
Dr. Carl C. Howard Jr. -
Received his BS in Microbiology from Lewis and Clark College
in Portland, Oregon and his Doctorate of Chiropractic from
the Los Angeles College of Chiropractic. He has been in private
practice in North Hollywood, CA for 32 years.
|